College

Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences

Date of Last Revision

2026-04-30 09:18:20

Major

Psychology

Honors Course

PSYC 498

Number of Credits

4

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Date of Expected Graduation

Spring 2026

Abstract

This literature review examines the relationship between the neurobiological determinants of psychopathy and the ethical implications of applying capital punishment to violent offenders. Drawing on research from neuroscience, psychology, and criminal justice, the paper explores how structural and functional differences in brain regions associated with emotional processing, impulse control, and moral reasoning are linked to psychopathic traits. The review synthesizes findings on how these neurobiological factors may contribute to an increased risk of violent behavior while emphasizing that such influences are not deterministic. The paper further analyzes how neuroscientific evidence is interpreted within legal contexts, particularly in relation to assessments of culpability and sentencing in capital cases. While individuals with psychopathic traits are generally considered capable of understanding right from wrong, impairments in emotional processing may complicate traditional assumptions of full moral responsibility. In response to these challenges, the paper also considers how multiple forms of evidence including psychological assessments, neurobiological findings, and behavioral history, might be more systematically integrated into legal decision-making. It proposes a conceptual framework for organizing such information to support more consistent evaluation of mitigating factors while acknowledging important ethical and practical limitations. Overall, the findings suggest that neurobiological evidence of psychopathy complicates, but does not eliminate, legal responsibility, instead supporting its consideration as a mitigating factor in capital sentencing. The review highlights the need for continued interdisciplinary research and more consistent standards for integrating neuroscientific evidence into legal decision-making.

Research Sponsor

Kevin Kaut

First Reader

Philip Allen

Second Reader

Nikolina Kravljaca

Honors Faculty Advisor

Kevin Kaut

Proprietary and/or Confidential Information

No

Community Engaged Scholarship

No

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.