College

College of Engineering and Polymer Science

Date of Last Revision

2026-04-28 12:32:49

Major

Chemical Engineering

Honors Course

CHEE 497-001

Number of Credits

3

Degree Name

Bachelor of Science

Date of Expected Graduation

Spring 2026

Abstract

Contact angle measurements are widely used to characterize surface wettability and determine changes in surface energy, yet the choice of measurement technique can significantly influence the results. This study compares the sessile drop and captive bubble methods for measuring contact angles of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solutions on carbon steel, stainless steel, and a hydrophobic wafer. Additionally, the time‑dependent wetting behavior of water, SDS, polysorbate 20 (commercial name Tween 20), and rhamnolipids on a hydrophobic wafer was evaluated over a five‑minute period. Results show that the sessile drop method consistently produced higher contact angles than the captive bubble method on metallic surfaces, with statistically significant differences at all SDS concentrations tested. These discrepancies arise from geometric and physical differences between the two methods. Time‑dependent measurements revealed that SDS, Tween 20, and rhamnolipids all reduced the contact angle on the hydrophobic wafer over time, with SDS showing the strongest concentration‑dependent effects and rhamnolipids exhibiting complex adsorption behavior. The captive bubble method showed minimal time dependence, indicating lower sensitivity to dynamic adsorption processes. Overall, the results highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate measurement technique based on surface type, surfactant chemistry, and whether dynamic or equilibrium behavior is of interest.

Research Sponsor

Dr. Bi-min Newby

First Reader

Dr. Lu-Kwang Ju

Second Reader

Dr. Scott Lillard

Honors Faculty Advisor

Dr. Bi-min Newby

Proprietary and/or Confidential Information

No

Community Engaged Scholarship

No

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.