Judicial Review

Document Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

2000

Abstract

In this co-authored chapter, William S. Jordan III provides a detailed analysis of key developments in judicial review of administrative action during the 2000–2001 period. The survey covers significant rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court and federal appellate courts that shaped the scope and standards of judicial oversight over agency rulemaking, adjudication, and enforcement. The chapter explores evolving interpretations of the Chevron and Skidmore deference doctrines, challenges to agency interpretations of statutes, the use of arbitrary and capricious review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and standing doctrines. Special attention is given to how courts are balancing deference to agency expertise with maintaining meaningful judicial checks on administrative discretion. The authors offer commentary on the implications of these trends for the future of administrative governance and rule-of-law principles.

Publication Title

Developments in Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice 1999-2000

Comments

The publisher is ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS