Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1992
Abstract
This article analyzes Justice David Souter’s early approach to statutory interpretation, drawing insights from his opinions shortly after joining the U.S. Supreme Court. William S. Jordan III situates Souter within the broader interpretive landscape, comparing his methodology to those of his contemporaries, particularly textualists and intentionalists. Jordan examines Souter’s nuanced engagement with legislative history, statutory text, and purpose, highlighting his tendency to seek a balanced and pragmatic interpretive stance. Rather than adhering rigidly to any single school of thought, Souter's opinions reflect a moderate, context-sensitive methodology grounded in respect for both legislative intent and judicial restraint. The article argues that Souter’s interpretive style contributes to a richer, more flexible jurisprudence during a time of increasing polarization over interpretive theory.
Publication Title
University of Toledo Law Review
Volume
23
First Page
491
Recommended Citation
Jordan III, William S., "Justice David Souter and Statutory Interpretation" (1992). Akron Law Faculty Publications. 457.
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/ua_law_publications/457