Con Law Center Articles and Publications
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2019
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court recently revived its jurisprudence of “leveling down,” that is, curing an equal protection violation of gender discrimination by denying the requested benefit to all rather than extending the benefit to the excluded class. This article challenges the continuation of the conventional acceptance of leveling down as an equally legitimate remedial option for gender discrimination. Instead, it argues for the adoption of an alternative remedial calculus of a strong presumption of leveling up remedies, overcome only by limited equitable considerations. Such a presumption better effectuates the substantive right of gender equality, as well as the correlative due process right to a meaningful remedy.
Publication Title
Harvard Journal of Law & Gender
Volume
42
First Page
177
Last Page
218
Recommended Citation
Tracy Thomas, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Vol. 42 (2018)