Abstract
This work sets out the constitutional, statutory, and common law applicable to television’s intrusion into the jury room. The first section addresses federal constitutional considerations focusing on Article III Section 2, the Sixth Amendment, and the First Amendment. The second section analyzes certain federal rules and particular statutes applicable to televising federal judicial proceedings, as well as the rationale behind their enactment. Finally, the third section discusses comparative approaches addressing television’s intrusion into the courtroom, particularly focusing on recent jurisprudence from the European Court of Human Rights and the Scottish Court of Session.
Recommended Citation
Erskine, Daniel H. Esq.
(2006)
"An Analysis of the Legality of Television Cameras Broadcasting Juror Deliberations in a Criminal Case,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 39:
Iss.
3, Article 3.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol39/iss3/3
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Human Rights Law Commons