Abstract
Considering these kinds of evidence together may offer an informed picture of a judge’s disposition. By these measures, Harlan cannot be regarded as a defender of Asian civil rights. Based on his voting record, he was the most ardent defender of African American civil rights. By contrast, his record in Asian cases was one of the worst. His votes in favor of African American civil rights were in critical cases. In most of the critical cases with respect to Asian litigants, he voted against them.
Recommended Citation
Chin, Gabriel J.
(1999)
"The First Justice Harlan by the Numbers: Just How Great was "The Great Dissenter?","
Akron Law Review: Vol. 32:
Iss.
3, Article 7.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol32/iss3/7
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons