Abstract
This note first reviews the facts of Edmonson. Second, this note examines the history of judicial inquiry into the use of peremptory challenges. Third, this note reviews the application of Batson to civil cases. Finally, this note analyzes the extension of the state action doctrine in Edmonson and discusses an alternative to the Edmonson approach to state action
Recommended Citation
Murdock, Chad
(1990)
"Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.: State Action or Inaction - Does It Matter?,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 23:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol23/iss1/5
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Race Commons