Abstract
Title III is an attempt to balance two purposes - protection of private citizens and control of organized crime. 9 Because of these diametric purposes, discussion of all aspects of Title III is beyond the scope of this comment. The first section of this comment will discuss the Supreme Court's past and present position on the use of electronic surveillance. The remainder of the comment will trace the development of the "one-party consent" exception as codified in Title III, analyzing its continued validity and applicability to private unauthorized electronic surveillance.
Recommended Citation
Daniels, Thomas C.
(1985)
"Does The "One-Party Consent" Exception Effectuate the Underlying Goals of Title III?,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 18:
Iss.
3, Article 7.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol18/iss3/7