Abstract
I subscribe to so much of the reform suggestions proposed by the authors that I believe my response can be most useful if confined to some emphasis or expansion of concurrent views, specific reference to disagreements and support for points of reform needed but not recommended.
Recommended Citation
Day, Jack Grant
(1983)
"Response to Professor Parness and Mr. Reagle,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 16:
Iss.
1, Article 3.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol16/iss1/3