Abstract
The first of the student articles on savings associations will examine various types of tie-in statutes and parity regulations which states have enacted to give their local savings associations the same powers as their federal counterparts. A framework for predicting the constitutional integrity of such statutes and regulations will then be established by reviewing United States Supreme Court analyses of federal statutes which, much like state parity statutes, delegate legislative power to administrative agencies. By using Ohio case law on delegation of authority, Ohio's statute which grants rule-making power to the Superintendent of Building and Loan Associations will then be analyzed as to its probable constitutionality. Finally, each type of tie-in statute and parity regulation will be viewed again to evaluate the due process safeguards provided in delegating authority.
Recommended Citation
(1978)
"Tie-In Statutes and Parity Regulations and Their Constitutionality,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 11:
Iss.
3, Article 4.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol11/iss3/4