Abstract
The opinion handed down in this recent decision from the Montgomery County Court of Appeals examined a question of first impression in the courts of Ohio. The issue presented was "whether a parole or probation officer is a law enforcement officer within the contemplation of Miranda and thus subject to the Miranda requirements of constitutional warnings to suspects during custodial interrogation...."
Recommended Citation
Treadon, Thomas A.
(1974)
"Evidence - Admissibility of Statements to Parole Officer - Miranda Warnings; State v. Gallagher,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 7:
Iss.
2, Article 6.
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol7/iss2/6
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons