The Ohio Supreme Court's Move Toward Quality Control of Court-Appointed Counsel for Indigent Defendants Charged With Capital Offense Crimes

Authors

George J. Ticoras

Abstract

This comment outlines the law in Ohio concerning court-appointed representation of indigent defendants in capital offense cases. A brief look at Ohio's "pre-C.P.Sup.R. 65" period provides the proper backdrop in which to examine C.P.Sup.R. 65's relation to the Ohio Public Defender's Regulations and the impact this rule may have throughout the State.

Recommended Citation

Ticoras, George J. (1988) "The Ohio Supreme Court's Move Toward Quality Control of Court-Appointed Counsel for Indigent Defendants Charged With Capital Offense Crimes," Akron Law Review: Vol. 21: Iss. 4, Article 7.
Available at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol21/iss4/7