Abstract
Words cannot describe photographs in the same sense that key words or subject headings can describe verbal documents because words are not native elements of photographs. Words can describe anecdata – reactions and associations that might be functional. Some form of data is coded in some medium, transmitted, received, and decoded. Some forms of coding and circumstances of message making and decoding require little proximity of the recipient to the message maker, while some forms utterly depend on proximity. We explore 10 photographs and interactive data accumulated through interactive exhibition to explore proximity and functional meaning. These examples demonstrate three levels of generality: any image with a particular object or characteristic will do; an image with certain qualities and intriguing connections is wanted; the photograph must show particular qualities or have a backstory that is explicit as to why this is the most useful image. We suggest that a first order taxonomy of proximity comes into play. We expand the idea of a taxonomy of proximity into the more inclusive, environmental notion of an ontology of proximities – referring to types of connections, types of uses, and circumstances of discovering the threads.
Recommended Citation
Bonnici, Laurie J. and O'Connor, Brian C.
(2019)
"More Than Meets The Eye: Toward an Ontology of Proximity,"
Proceedings from the Document Academy: Vol. 6
:
Iss.
1
, Article 12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/6/1/13
Available at:
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/docam/vol6/iss1/12
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.35492/docam/6/1/13