Akron Law Student Publications

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2024

Abstract

While new artificial intelligence models see unprecedented investment, serious questions exist about the ownership of the models themselves under existing intellectual property structures. AI models, as compilations of information created largely autonomously by algorithms from sets of training data, may not be suited for the subject matter and inventorship/authorship requirements of traditional patent and copyright protection. The literature assumes that trade secrecy will protect AI models, which are largely kept secret on remote servers away from direct inspection by users, but model extraction attack methods known since 2016 are effective in copying any AI model that can be queried. This potential for copying compromises the viability of trade secrecy as an intellectual property framework for AI models. Model extraction attacks can also extract substantial amounts of training data that the model memorizes during its training period, potentially also compromising the trade secrecy of any proprietary training data. With protection for AI models by other avenues-patent and copyright-also in doubt, it is possible that AI models are not protectable or owned under current law.

First Page

1

Comments

This article is published in SSRN

Download

Share

COinS