Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1994
Abstract
This article examines the secretive nature of judicial disciplinary proceedings in the United States federal courts. It argues that the current system—characterized by confidentiality and limited public access—undermines key democratic values, including transparency, accountability, and public trust in the judiciary. The author critically analyzes the statutory framework and procedures established under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 and illustrates how these processes fall short of ensuring meaningful oversight. By reviewing specific case studies and empirical data, the article calls for a reexamination of confidentiality rules and advocates for reforms that would balance judicial independence with the public’s right to oversight and openness. The piece concludes that without such reforms, the legitimacy and perceived integrity of the federal judiciary remain at risk.
Publication Title
Notre Dame Law Review
Volume
70
First Page
193
Recommended Citation
Sahl, John P., "Secret Discipline in the Federal Courts – Democratic Values and Judicial Integrity at Stake" (1994). Akron Law Faculty Publications. 439.
https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/ua_law_publications/439