Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

This article, explores the ethical, procedural, and institutional dimensions of lawyer self-regulation. It critically examines how legal professionals govern themselves in the absence of external oversight and analyzes the effectiveness, transparency, and accountability of current self-regulatory frameworks. Drawing on case studies, disciplinary records, and empirical research, the article interrogates whether self-regulation serves the public interest or primarily protects the legal profession. It further investigates the cultural and systemic incentives that influence lawyers' conduct and the willingness of regulatory bodies to enforce professional standards. The work ultimately calls for rethinking regulatory models to promote greater accountability, public trust, and integrity in legal practice.

Publication Title

San Diego Law Review

Volume

48

First Page

447

Download

Share

COinS