This short paper examines the likely effect of the Court's three opinions on the actual practice of intellectual property cases in their remedial phase. The first part briefly discusses the unanimous opinion and its likely economic effect in increasing the already daunting complexity-and therefore the already considerable cost-of intellectual property litigation. The second part examines the first concurring opinion and the effect of its implicit suggestion that nothing much has really changed. The third part examines the possible practical effect of the second concurring opinion. The conclusion then offers a few general observations on where remedial practice in patent cases might go from here.
Dratler, Jay Jr.
"eBay's Practical Effect: Two Differing Visions,"
Akron Intellectual Property Journal: Vol. 2
, Article 2.
Available at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronintellectualproperty/vol2/iss1/2