I argue in this paper that, because Maples and Martinez coincide with other important developments that make state postconviction more important, they could have critical synergistic effects. Maples and Martinez create incentive for states to provide effective counsel in state postconviction at a moment when these proceedings are being forced to assume a new role in the development of federal constitutional criminal procedure. The confluence of these events could produce a new era in state postconviction.
"The New State Postconviction,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 46
, Article 5.
Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol46/iss2/5