OHIO CIVIL LIBERTARIANS have long claimed that a criminal defendant is likely to have his due process rights better protected in the federal courts than in Ohio courts. One measure of that protection is how the courts respond when a defendant alleges that his confession was involuntary and thus not properly admissible as evidence at his trial. The central issue then is whether the Ohio courts have kept as much in step with the United States Supreme Court as have the federal courts in their revisions of what is the proper test of voluntariness of a confession.
"The Involuntary Confession and the Right to Due Process: Is a Criminal Defendant Better Protected in the Federal Courts Than in Ohio?,"
Akron Law Review: Vol. 10
, Article 3.
Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol10/iss2/3